How can inter proffesional working improve the

Published online Apr 8.

How can inter proffesional working improve the

Enter terms How effective are strategies to improve the way health and social care professional groups work together?

How can inter proffesional working improve the

What is the aim of this review? The aim of this Cochrane Review was to find out whether strategies to improve interprofessional collaboration the process by which different health and social care professional groups work togethercan positively impact the delivery of care to patients.

Cochrane researchers collected and analysed all relevant studies to answer this question, and found nine studies with participants. Key messages Strategies to improve interprofessional collaboration between health and social care professionals may slightly improve patient functional status, professionals' adherence to recommended practices, and the use of healthcare resources.

Due to the lack of clear evidence, we are uncertain whether the strategies improved patient-assessed quality of care, continuity of care, or collaborative working. What was studied in this review?

Background

The extent to which different health and social care professionals work well together affects the quality of the care that they provide. If there are problems in how these professionals communicate and interact with each other, this can lead to problems in patient care.

Interprofessional collaboration practice-based interventions are strategies that are put into place in healthcare settings to improve interactions and work processes between two or more types of healthcare professionals.

This review studied different interprofessional collaboration interventions, compared to usual care or an alternative interventionto see if they improved patient care or collaboration. What are the main results of the review? The review authors found nine relevant studies across primary, secondary, tertiary and community care settings.

Most of the studies were well conducted, although some studies reported that many participants dropped out. The studies evaluated different methods of interprofessional collaboration, namely externally facilitated interprofessional activities e. Externally facilitated interprofessional activities may slightly improve patient functional status and health care professionals' adherence to recommended practices, and may slightly improve use of healthcare resources.

We are uncertain whether externally facilitated interprofessional activities improve patient-assessed quality of care, continuity of care, or collaborative working behaviours. The use of interprofessional rounds and interprofessional checklists may slightly improve the use of healthcare resources.

You may also be interested in:

Interprofessional meetings may slightly improve adherence to recommended practices, and may slightly improve use of healthcare resources. Further research is needed, including studies testing the interventions at scale to develop a better understanding of the range of possible interventions and their effectivenesshow they affect interprofessional collaboration and lead to changes in care and patient health outcomes, and in what circumstances such interventions may be most useful.

How up to date is this review? The review authors searched for studies that had been published to November Given that the certainty of evidence from the included studies was judged to be low to very low, there is not sufficient evidence to draw clear conclusions on the effects of IPC interventions.

Neverthess, due to the difficulties health professionals encounter when collaborating in clinical practice, it is encouraging that research on the number of interventions to improve IPC has increased since this review was last updated.

While this field is developing, further rigorous, mixed-method studies are required. Future studies should focus on longer acclimatisation periods before evaluating newly implemented IPC interventions, and use longer follow-up to generate a more informed understanding of the effects of IPC on clinical practice.

Read the full abstractcan hinder communication, which can negatively affect patient care 5Research is needed on the effects of IPL learning beyond undergraduate studies professional lives in a clinical setting (WHO, ).

Interprofessional learning (IPL) was born. Initially, IPL was defined as “learning together to promote collaborative prac-tice” (Hammick, ).

can hinder communication, which can negatively affect patient care 5Research is needed on the effects of IPL learning beyond undergraduate studies professional lives in a clinical setting (WHO, ).

Interprofessional learning (IPL) was born. Initially, IPL was defined as “learning together to promote collaborative prac-tice” (Hammick, ).

Patients, health care team members and the organization all benefit from interprofessional teamwork.

How can inter proffesional working improve the

How can evidence-based teamwork be implemented? Providers need to promote a change in organizational culture from an environment of working in silos to . In delivering health care, an effective teamwork can immediately and positively affect patient safety and outcome.

The need for effective teams is increasing due to increasing co-morbidities and increasing complexity of specialization of care. Strategies to improve interprofessional collaboration between health and social care professionals may slightly improve patient functional status, professionals' adherence to recommended practices, and the use of healthcare resources.

Bringing together professionals from different disciplines can yield tremendous results for patients with cancer. By pulling in different perspectives from nurses, physicians, pharmacists, social workers, chaplains, and more, interprofessional teams can draw from the expertise of their members to provide the best possible care for patients.

Professional Communication and Team Collaboration - Patient Safety and Quality - NCBI Bookshelf